Personal tools
You are here: Home Forums SecMX RFC Discussion : CLOSED 1. Introduction
Document Actions

1. Introduction

by Mike Pearson last modified 2006-07-07 14:12

SecMX: A standard for increasing MTA-MTA privacy.

The SecMX IETF RFC Draft

Network Working Group                                         M. Pearson
Internet-Draft                                               F. Hendrikx
Expires: June 4, 2006                          State Services Commission
                                                                 G. Cant
                                                             Catalyst IT
                                                           December 2005


            SecMX: A standard for increasing MTA-MTA privacy
                draft-pearson-hendrikx-cant-secmx-01.txt

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.



Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

   Working within the current standards where possible, this document
   presents SecMX: a standard to increase MTA-MTA privacy.


1.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

« December 2008 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
 

Powered by Plone, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: